norda 001 vs Saucony Xodus Ultra 4

norda 001 vs Saucony Xodus Ultra 4, side by side on equal terms. Differences are emphasised; matching specs are dimmed.

Specification	norda 001	Saucony Xodus Ultra 4
MSRP	$295	$170
Weight	268g	309g
Drop	5mm	6mm
Stack (heel/forefoot)	26/21mm	36/30mm
Lug depth	5mm	4mm
Surface	Trail	Trail
Primary use	Long Distance	Long Distance
Cushion	Moderate	High
Firmness	Balanced	Soft
Stability	Neutral	—
Plate	None	Unknown
Waterproof	No	—
Midsole	—	PWRRUN PB (framed with PWRRUN chassis)
Outsole	—	Vibram Megagrip
Width availability	Standard	Standard
Best for	Ultra runners who prioritize a durable, lightweight shoe with reliable Vibram Megagrip traction and are willing to pay a premium.	Long days and ultra-distance on mixed and rugged terrain where you want protection, cushion, and dependable Vibram MegaGrip grip.
Avoid if	You want maximum plush cushioning, wide sizing, or a rock plate for very technical terrain, or you're price-sensitive.	You want a light, fast shoe for short or racing efforts, or prefer a firm, ground-feel ride.
Lowest offer	—	—

Which should you pick?

head-to-head · opinion

The norda 001 is the lighter shoe at 268g with a lower 26/21mm stack, making it the pick for ultra runners who want a nimble, durable trail shoe and can stomach the steep 295 USD price. The Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 is heavier at 309g but offers far more protection with its 36/30mm high-cushion stack at a much friendlier 170 USD. Choose the norda for a firmer, faster feel, and the Xodus for maximum cushion on long, rugged days when you'd rather save money.