Running Shoes HQBack to catalogue

HOKA Challenger 8 vs HOKA Challenger 8 GTX

HOKA Challenger 8 vs HOKA Challenger 8 GTX, side by side on equal terms. Differences are emphasised; matching specs are dimmed.

Specification
MSRP$155$165
Weight275g314.7g
Drop8mm8mm
Stack (heel/forefoot)
Lug depth4mm4mm
SurfaceHybridHybrid
Primary useDailyDaily
CushionHighHigh
FirmnessBalancedBalanced
StabilityNeutralNeutral
PlateNoneNone
WaterproofNoYes
MidsoleCMEVA (compression molded EVA)CMEVA (compression molded EVA)
OutsoleTrail Traction rubberTrail Traction
Width availabilityStandardStandard
Best forRunners who mix road and light-to-moderate trail and want plush daily-training cushioning.Runners who want a versatile door-to-trail cushioned shoe with weather protection for wet or muddy conditions.
Avoid ifYou need aggressive grip and rock protection for technical, rocky, or muddy terrain.You need light weight, ground feel, or grip on steep, technical, or rocky terrain.
Lowest offer

Which should you pick?

head-to-head · opinion

The HOKA Challenger 8 and Challenger 8 GTX are the same cushioned hybrid trainer, so the choice comes down to weather protection versus weight. Pick the GTX ($165) if you regularly run in wet or muddy conditions and want the waterproof upper, and accept the roughly 40 g penalty (314.7 g vs 275 g). Go with the standard Challenger 8 ($155) if you run mostly in dry conditions and would rather have the lighter, cheaper shoe.