Brooks Revel Max vs Brooks Revel Max
Brooks Revel Max vs Brooks Revel Max, side by side on equal terms. Differences are emphasised; matching specs are dimmed.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $120 | $120 |
| Weight | 278g | 252g |
| Drop | 6mm | 6mm |
| Stack (heel/forefoot) | — | — |
| Lug depth | — | — |
| Surface | Road | Road |
| Primary use | Daily | Daily |
| Cushion | Moderate | Moderate |
| Firmness | Balanced | Balanced |
| Stability | Neutral | — |
| Plate | None | Unknown |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Midsole | — | DNA LOFT v2 |
| Outsole | — | — |
| Width availability | Standard | Standard |
| Best for | Budget-minded runners who want one comfortable shoe for easy runs and casual wear. | Runners and walkers who want an affordable, comfortable everyday shoe for easy-paced miles and time on their feet. |
| Avoid if | You want plush max cushioning or an energetic, responsive feel for faster efforts. | You want a responsive shoe for tempo work or races, or you need a wide width. |
| Lowest offer | — | — |
Which should you pick?
head-to-head · opinionThese are the same shoe in different fits: the Brooks Revel Max and the women's Revel Max share a 6 mm drop, moderate cushion, and 120 USD price, with the women's version coming in lighter at 252 g versus 278 g. Both are budget daily trainers built for easy miles and casual wear, so pick by fit rather than function. Neither is the right call if you want a responsive shoe for tempo runs or races.