Brooks Cascadia 19 vs Brooks Cascadia 19 GTX
Brooks Cascadia 19 vs Brooks Cascadia 19 GTX, side by side on equal terms. Differences are emphasised; matching specs are dimmed.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $180 |
| Weight | 303g | 318g |
| Drop | 6mm | 6mm |
| Stack (heel/forefoot) | — | — |
| Lug depth | 4mm | 4mm |
| Surface | Trail | Trail |
| Primary use | Long Distance | Long Distance |
| Cushion | Moderate | Moderate |
| Firmness | Balanced | Balanced |
| Stability | Neutral | Neutral |
| Plate | None | None |
| Waterproof | No | Yes |
| Midsole | — | — |
| Outsole | — | — |
| Width availability | Standard | Standard |
| Best for | Runners who want a stable, protective workhorse for long or technical trail miles. | Runners who want a stable, waterproof shoe for wet and technical trails in cool conditions. |
| Avoid if | You want a light, responsive shoe for fast terrain or racing. | You want a light, lively shoe or need breathability in warm weather. |
| Lowest offer | — | — |
Which should you pick?
head-to-head · opinionThe Brooks Cascadia 19 and Cascadia 19 GTX are the same stable trail workhorse, so the real choice is weather protection versus breathability. Pick the GTX ($180, 318 g) if you regularly run wet or cold trails and want the waterproof upper; go with the standard Cascadia 19 ($150, 303 g) if you run in warmer conditions, want better breathability, and would rather save weight and money.