Brooks Cascadia 19 GTX vs Brooks Cascadia 20 GTX
Brooks Cascadia 19 GTX vs Brooks Cascadia 20 GTX, side by side on equal terms. Differences are emphasised; matching specs are dimmed.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $180 | $190 |
| Weight | 318g | 323.2g |
| Drop | 6mm | 6mm |
| Stack (heel/forefoot) | — | — |
| Lug depth | 4mm | 4mm |
| Surface | Trail | Trail |
| Primary use | Long Distance | Technical |
| Cushion | Moderate | Moderate |
| Firmness | Balanced | Balanced |
| Stability | Neutral | — |
| Plate | None | Unknown |
| Waterproof | Yes | Yes |
| Midsole | — | Nitrogen-infused DNA FLASH v2 |
| Outsole | — | Vibram Megagrip with Traction Lug technology |
| Width availability | Standard | Standard |
| Best for | Runners who want a stable, waterproof shoe for wet and technical trails in cool conditions. | Runners tackling wet, muddy, or technical trails who want a stable, waterproof shoe and don't mind the extra weight. |
| Avoid if | You want a light, lively shoe or need breathability in warm weather. | You want a light, breathable shoe for fast efforts or hot, dry conditions, since the GORE-TEX upper adds weight and traps heat. |
| Lowest offer | — | — |
Which should you pick?
head-to-head · opinionThese are close siblings: the Cascadia 19 GTX (318 g) and Cascadia 20 GTX (323.2 g) share a 6 mm drop, moderate cushion, and a waterproof GORE-TEX upper for wet and technical trails. The main trade-off is small—the 19 is a few grams lighter and $10 cheaper, while the 20 leans harder into technical terrain. Pick the 19 GTX to save money on long wet-weather miles, and the 20 GTX if you want the latest version for more demanding technical trails.